government policies fall well short of what is needed to maintain it. Technological leadership is more important than ever, yet current U.S. Its chief argument is that the United States is in a long-term, multifaceted geostrategic competition with China, one that has technology at its core. The first report in this initiative, “ Taking the Helm,” makes the case for a national technology strategy and lays out what such a modern-day strategy should be. The goal of CNAS’ National Technology Strategy project is to create the framework for a comprehensive, whole-of-nation approach for the United States to navigate the global technology competition. government lacks a strategic construct to merge these ideas-for research and development spending, public-private partnerships, tax policy and subsidies, immigration reform, and education-into a coherent whole.
![national security actio national security actio](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/iOWQugNufX4/maxresdefault.jpg)
It’s not just the sheer volume that presents a challenge to identifying and executing the most promising recommendations.
![national security actio national security actio](https://www.jfklibrary.org/sites/default/files/2018-06/004nsf06nsam267_10181963.jpg)
Some of these recommendations are excellent and quite a few are good too many get lost in the noise. Almost all make their case in the context of dealing with a rising China. Concerning topics as diverse as raw materials to semiconductors to STEM education, a nonstop cavalcade of presidential directives, congressional bills, industry proposals, think tank reports, and pronouncements by big-name luminaries have been issued as measures to address American economic competitiveness and national security challenges. Ideas abound for actions the United States should take to better position itself for the unfolding global technology competition.